The current spotlight on the Middle East these days is centered around Iran and their extremely controversial nuclear program. To make a long story short; there are major powers around the world such as usa, uk israel, france, and all of their puppet states that are completely against Iran obtaining nuclear energy. These nations put together the equation that Iran plus nuclear power would equal israel's massive destruction....?
Ok, hypothetically speaking, let's say that Iran did in fact obtain a nuclear weapon(s). What's the big deal? They're not bullies, they're not murderers, and they are not terrorists. I happen to know that israel is suspected of having a massive arsenal of nuclear weapons. In fact, they indirectly admit to having it because they openly advocated the use of their so-called "samsun option" (look if up if you don't know what it is). Why would israel be making threats to destroy itself and all of the nations around it with nuclear weapons and at the same time they don't openly admit to possessing it. If you ask me, israel's the real threat in the Middle East. Not Iran. I mean, they never once admitted to even have the intentions of manufacturing nuclear weapons; yet everyone in the world seems to think that it is their number one priority. The only argument that the west has against Iran is the whole idea of the Iranian government not allowing international atomic energy officials to inspect their own classified military base that's "suspected" of possessing these weapons.
Responding to what has been said above, I don't believe the IAEA or anybody other than the Iranian government have the right to go to classified areas of their country and "inspect" vital points about their so called "nuclear program". I fully fully support the Iranian government wanting to enrich their uranium and I would even support them if they wanted to build nuclear weapons. People in israel claim that if Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons, then it'll spark a Middle Eastern "Cold War". Even if it does, what is the business of the other nations??
The opposition of the west and major world powers against the Middle East's advancement is something that seems to anger me a lot. It so happens that fallacies about the Middle East are viewed through the same pair of binoculars that essentially provide a tainted panorama of the Middle East and its "extremist" intentions. Iran nowadays is known as the "warmonger" because their holding excessive amounts of military exercises because of direct threats from opposing nations to make air strikes on Iran. So it's only natural for them to respond with the same, if not, more aggressive threats for they are not the ones who initiated the conflict in the first place.
Other people claim that this conflict over Iran is going to be the reason why the world is plunged into world war three.........no it's not. Nobody is going to initiate massive world destruction over some nation that appears to be advancing, because that is what is comes down to. World leaders aren't dumb and they know that if an attack on Iran happened the consequences would be devastating. Only then would a massive war break out; but until then, I don't believe in any military actions....from either side.
Ok, hypothetically speaking, let's say that Iran did in fact obtain a nuclear weapon(s). What's the big deal? They're not bullies, they're not murderers, and they are not terrorists. I happen to know that israel is suspected of having a massive arsenal of nuclear weapons. In fact, they indirectly admit to having it because they openly advocated the use of their so-called "samsun option" (look if up if you don't know what it is). Why would israel be making threats to destroy itself and all of the nations around it with nuclear weapons and at the same time they don't openly admit to possessing it. If you ask me, israel's the real threat in the Middle East. Not Iran. I mean, they never once admitted to even have the intentions of manufacturing nuclear weapons; yet everyone in the world seems to think that it is their number one priority. The only argument that the west has against Iran is the whole idea of the Iranian government not allowing international atomic energy officials to inspect their own classified military base that's "suspected" of possessing these weapons.
Responding to what has been said above, I don't believe the IAEA or anybody other than the Iranian government have the right to go to classified areas of their country and "inspect" vital points about their so called "nuclear program". I fully fully support the Iranian government wanting to enrich their uranium and I would even support them if they wanted to build nuclear weapons. People in israel claim that if Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons, then it'll spark a Middle Eastern "Cold War". Even if it does, what is the business of the other nations??
The opposition of the west and major world powers against the Middle East's advancement is something that seems to anger me a lot. It so happens that fallacies about the Middle East are viewed through the same pair of binoculars that essentially provide a tainted panorama of the Middle East and its "extremist" intentions. Iran nowadays is known as the "warmonger" because their holding excessive amounts of military exercises because of direct threats from opposing nations to make air strikes on Iran. So it's only natural for them to respond with the same, if not, more aggressive threats for they are not the ones who initiated the conflict in the first place.
Other people claim that this conflict over Iran is going to be the reason why the world is plunged into world war three.........no it's not. Nobody is going to initiate massive world destruction over some nation that appears to be advancing, because that is what is comes down to. World leaders aren't dumb and they know that if an attack on Iran happened the consequences would be devastating. Only then would a massive war break out; but until then, I don't believe in any military actions....from either side.
No comments:
Post a Comment