I know I promised to discuss the tourism industry among the different nations of the Middle East, however due to the current state of the region and the different revolutions that have been taking place, I realize that I need to address something else very important. Something that people who seem to be looking for something corrupt in the current regime seem to overlook. Something that I myself didn't know existed until I looked into it. But before I go into that, I will have to apologize for my inconsistencies throughout my posts.
Now, people will have excuse my anger if it seems to be expressed by a lot, however this is an angering topic. The topic consists of very transparent empires; ones that now are expanding in the Middle East. The core of this so- called "empire" are the ones that seem to be ambiguous to the outside world. Nonetheless, people in the Middle East do sense something that is out of place. The core of these empires seems to be located in the west and other places in Europe. The entire modern era of the Middle East wasn't dominated by the Arab culture. Now doubt the Arab cultures were present, however, something is different when you have British nations and French nations occupying and taking over different countries in the Middle East.
Ok, so many revolutions took place that completely removed these outsiders; or so they (Arabs) thought. Contemporary rulers of the Middle East are the mere puppets of the west. They (the west) know very well that any new occupation won't help their case and in conclusion, they won't be successful. They have accepted that fact and so to counter attack it they have decided to plant different "rulers" among the different nations in the Middle East.
What's the point of planting these rulers in the first place? Their purpose is to benefit the "implanting" country; which in this case is the world powers which are classified as the west. Essentially what the rulers would do is they'd accept massive amounts of bribes from these large powers and in return they'd incorporate the idealistic principles that in the end would benefit the countries that put them there. For instance, they'd want to expand the thoughts of secularism, modernism, and tag anybody who maybe classified as an extremist as a potential terrorist.
Unwanted treaties were formed and citizens of the nations that were wronged started despising their rulers. The parasite that infests the Middle East is the source of all "evil" and political trouble that even powerful nations aren't able to solve.
Like I said, it is a transparent occupation. Any new rules or regulations that are imposed on the "occupied" countries are essentially the rules and regulations of the occupying nation; it is just someone else (the rulers) enforcing it for them so the world doesn't view the occupying nation as a threat. It's just one large show that everyone seemed to buy before; but now ever since the Arab Spring, many revolutions overthrew their rulers and the occupying nations are more worried than ever. They don't know whether they should interfere to protect their interests there or what. If they do that first option, they're prone to attacks from other nations and also it is like they want themselves to carry the title of occupier. So it won't be in their best interest to do so. In the end, the best solution for everyone is they (the world powers) accept the fact that they are no longer ventriloquists and the Arab rulers are no longer puppets for anyone.
Now, people will have excuse my anger if it seems to be expressed by a lot, however this is an angering topic. The topic consists of very transparent empires; ones that now are expanding in the Middle East. The core of this so- called "empire" are the ones that seem to be ambiguous to the outside world. Nonetheless, people in the Middle East do sense something that is out of place. The core of these empires seems to be located in the west and other places in Europe. The entire modern era of the Middle East wasn't dominated by the Arab culture. Now doubt the Arab cultures were present, however, something is different when you have British nations and French nations occupying and taking over different countries in the Middle East.
Ok, so many revolutions took place that completely removed these outsiders; or so they (Arabs) thought. Contemporary rulers of the Middle East are the mere puppets of the west. They (the west) know very well that any new occupation won't help their case and in conclusion, they won't be successful. They have accepted that fact and so to counter attack it they have decided to plant different "rulers" among the different nations in the Middle East.
What's the point of planting these rulers in the first place? Their purpose is to benefit the "implanting" country; which in this case is the world powers which are classified as the west. Essentially what the rulers would do is they'd accept massive amounts of bribes from these large powers and in return they'd incorporate the idealistic principles that in the end would benefit the countries that put them there. For instance, they'd want to expand the thoughts of secularism, modernism, and tag anybody who maybe classified as an extremist as a potential terrorist.
Unwanted treaties were formed and citizens of the nations that were wronged started despising their rulers. The parasite that infests the Middle East is the source of all "evil" and political trouble that even powerful nations aren't able to solve.
Like I said, it is a transparent occupation. Any new rules or regulations that are imposed on the "occupied" countries are essentially the rules and regulations of the occupying nation; it is just someone else (the rulers) enforcing it for them so the world doesn't view the occupying nation as a threat. It's just one large show that everyone seemed to buy before; but now ever since the Arab Spring, many revolutions overthrew their rulers and the occupying nations are more worried than ever. They don't know whether they should interfere to protect their interests there or what. If they do that first option, they're prone to attacks from other nations and also it is like they want themselves to carry the title of occupier. So it won't be in their best interest to do so. In the end, the best solution for everyone is they (the world powers) accept the fact that they are no longer ventriloquists and the Arab rulers are no longer puppets for anyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment